Tag: Administrative Punishment

The Market Supervision Bureau of Laiwu District, Jinan City exposes 7 cases of punishment in the food and drug sector
By: Date: 2021-04-17 Categories: chinesefood Tags: ,

According to the requirements of the”Opinions of Shandong Provincial Administration of Market Supervision on Several Issues Concerning the Implementation of the”Four Strict” Requirements in Food and Drug Law Enforcement Cases”, a batch of food and drug cases recently investigated and handled by the Laiwu District Market Supervision Administration are now exposed as follows.

Read More →
The State Administration of Market Supervision issued the Administrative Penalty Decision of Beijing Shihui Technology Co., Ltd. for the Unfair Price Behavior Case (Guo Shi Jian Office [2021] No. 9)
By: Date: 2021-03-13 Categories: authoritativerelease Tags: ,

On March 3, 2021, the State Administration of Market Supervision made an administrative penalty decision on the case of Beijing Shihui Technology Co., Ltd. for improper price conduct. The administrative penalty decision is hereby announced.

Read More →
The State Administration of Market Supervision issued the Administrative Penalty Decision on the Unfair Price Behavior Case of Shenzhen Meituan Optimal Technology Co., Ltd. (Guocheng Supervision Office [2021] No. 8)
By: Date: 2021-03-13 Categories: authoritativerelease Tags: ,

On March 3, 2021, the State Administration of Market Supervision made an administrative penalty decision on the case of Shenzhen Meituan Optimal Technology Co., Ltd. for improper price conduct. The administrative penalty decision is hereby announced.

Read More →
The State Administration of Market Supervision issued the administrative penalty decision on the improper price conduct of Wuhan Qizhong Meiwei Technology Co., Ltd. (Guocheng Supervision Department [2021] No. 10)
By: Date: 2021-03-13 Categories: authoritativerelease Tags: ,

On March 3, 2021, the State Administration of Market Supervision made an administrative penalty decision on the improper price behavior of Wuhan Qizhong Meiwei Technology Co., Ltd., and the administrative penalty decision is hereby announced.

Read More →
The State Administration of Market Supervision issued the Administrative Penalty Decision of Shanghai Yucan Information Technology Co., Ltd. in the case of improper price conduct (Guocheng Supervision Office [2021] No. 7)
By: Date: 2021-03-13 Categories: authoritativerelease Tags: ,

On March 3, 2021, the State Administration for Market Regulation made an administrative penalty decision on the improper price conduct of Shanghai Yucan Information Technology Co., Ltd., and the administrative penalty decision is hereby announced.

Read More →
The State Administration of Market Supervision issued the Administrative Penalty Decision on the Unfair Price Behavior Case of Orange Heart Optimal (Beijing) Technology Development Co., Ltd. (Guo Shi Jian Office [2021] No. 6)
By: Date: 2021-03-13 Categories: authoritativerelease Tags: ,

On March 3, 2021, the State Administration for Market Regulation made an administrative penalty decision on the improper price behavior of Orange Heart Optimal (Beijing) Technology Development Co., Ltd., and the administrative penalty decision is hereby announced.

Read More →
Brief introduction to discretion in food safety supervision
By: Date: 2020-11-04 Categories: chinesefood Tags: ,

Under the requirements of the”four most stringent” requirements for food safety supervision, how are the principles and extent of discretion formulated? How should food companies avoid high-limit penalties? FoodPartner.com has interpreted and analyzed the content of discretion in food supervision, hoping to help everyone further understand and understand the knowledge of discretion.

Read More →