The Market Supervision Bureau of Laiwu District, Jinan City exposes 14 cases of punishment in the food sector
By: Date: 2021-03-07 Categories: chinesefood Tags:
   In order to further strengthen food and drug safety supervision, warn production and operation users to earnestly fulfill the awareness of the first responsible person, strictly abide by the bottom line of food and drug safety, and remind consumers to increase safety awareness and actively participate in food and drug safety co-governance. The following cases handled were exposed:
  1. The canteen of Tusikou Primary School in Laiwu District, Jinan City purchased food raw materials (soybean sprouts) that did not meet the food safety standards, and failed to check the license and related supporting documents when purchasing the goods.
   The unit’s act of purchasing food raw materials (soybean sprouts) that do not meet food safety standards, and failing to inspect the license and related certification documents when purchasing the goods, violated Article 55, Paragraph 1 of the”Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China” , Article 53 Paragraph 1, in accordance with the provisions of Article 125 Paragraph 1 and Article 126 Paragraph 1 of the”Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China”, give the unit a warning, Confiscation of illegal income of 1.20 yuan and a fine of two thousand yuan (2000.00) yuan for administrative penalties.
  2. Yujin Store, Laicheng District, Laiwu City, deals with edible agricultural products (soybean sprouts) whose pesticide residue content exceeds the limit of food safety standards and fails to establish purchase inspection records and keep relevant vouchers.
   The unit’s behavior in dealing in edible agricultural products (soybean sprouts) with pesticide residues exceeding the limit of food safety standards violated Article 25, Paragraph 2 of the”Measures for the Supervision and Administration of the Quality and Safety of Edible Agricultural Products Market Sales” by purchasing celery The failure to establish purchase inspection records and keep relevant vouchers violated Article 65 of the”Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China” and is based on Article 50, paragraph 2 of the”Measures for the Supervision and Administration of the Quality and Safety of Edible Agricultural Products Market Sales”. According to the provisions of Article 124, Paragraph 1, Paragraph 1, Article 126, Paragraph 4, and Article 126, Paragraph 1 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China, the unit shall be given a warning , A fine of five thousand yuan (5000.00) yuan, and the confiscation of one yuan and four yuan (1.4 yuan) of illegal income is an administrative penalty.
  3. Qi Huidong deals with edible agricultural products (celery) whose pesticide residue content exceeds the limit of food safety standards and has not established purchase inspection records and preservation of relevant vouchers.
   The company’s behavior in dealing in edible agricultural products (celery) with pesticide residues exceeding the limit of food safety standards violated Article 25, Paragraph 2 of the”Measures for the Supervision and Administration of the Quality and Safety of Edible Agricultural Products Market Sales”. When purchasing celery Failure to establish purchase inspection records and keep relevant vouchers violates Article 65 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China, and is based on Article 50, paragraph 2 of the Measures for the Supervision and Administration of the Quality and Safety of Edible Agricultural Products Market Sales. According to the provisions of Article 124, Paragraph 1, Paragraph 1, Article 126, Paragraph 4, and Article 126, Paragraph 1 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China, the unit shall be warned, A fine of five thousand yuan (5000.00) and confiscation of illegal gains of four yuan and two cents (4.42) are administrative penalties.
  4. Ren Mingxia manages and uses veterinary edible agricultural products (pig lung) prohibited by the state and fails to establish purchase inspection records and save relevant vouchers
   The operation and use of veterinary edible agricultural products (pig lungs) prohibited by the state violated Article 25 of the”Measures for the Supervision and Administration of the Quality and Safety of Edible Agricultural Products Market Sales”, and the purchase inspection record was not established when purchasing pig lungs. The act of keeping relevant vouchers violates the provisions of Article 65 of the”Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China”, and is in accordance with Article 50, paragraph 1,”Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China”,”Article 123, Paragraph 4 of Article 126, Paragraph 1 of Article 126 shall give the unit a warning, a fine of five thousand (5000.00) yuan, and confiscation of illegal income. An administrative penalty of 10 yuan (98.00).
  5. Xu Chunyuan Meat Wholesale Department, Laiwu District, Jinan City, deals with edible agricultural products whose veterinary drug residue content exceeds the food safety standard limit and has not established a purchase inspection record
   The unit’s conduct of operating edible agricultural products with veterinary drug residues exceeding the limit of food safety standards violated the provisions of Article 25, Item 2 of the”Measures for the Supervision and Administration of the Quality and Safety of Edible Agricultural Products Market Sales”. And meat products * with bones and wings) did not establish purchase inspection records in violation of Article 65 of the”Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China”, in accordance with Article 50 of the”Measures for the Supervision and Administration of the Quality and Safety of Edible Agricultural Products Market Sales” The second paragraph, the provisions of Article 124, Paragraph 1, Paragraph 1, Article 126, Paragraph 4, and Article 126, Paragraph 1 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China, The unit was given a warning, a fine of seven thousand yuan (7000.00), and an administrative penalty of five hundred and six yuan (560.00) of illegal income confiscated.
  6. Zhai Yuqin deals with edible agricultural products whose pesticide residue content exceeds the limit of food safety standards and has not established purchase inspection records and storage of relevant vouchers
   The unit’s behavior in dealing in edible agricultural products (celery) with pesticide residues exceeding the limit of food safety standards violated Article 25, Paragraph 2 of the”Measures for the Supervision and Administration of the Quality and Safety of Edible Agricultural Products Market Sales” by purchasing celery The failure to establish purchase inspection records and keep relevant vouchers violated Article 65 of the”Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China” and is based on Article 50, paragraph 2 of the”Measures for the Supervision and Administration of the Quality and Safety of Edible Agricultural Products Market Sales”. According to the provisions of Article 124, Paragraph 1, Paragraph 1, Article 126, Paragraph 4, and Article 126, Paragraph 1 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China, the unit shall be given a warning , A fine of five thousand (5000.00) yuan and an administrative penalty of one ten (10.00) yuan of illegal income confiscated.
  Seven. The second store of Jinan 18 Jiayue Supermarket Co., Ltd., Laiwu Co., Ltd., was operating edible agricultural products (male hairy crabs) that used veterinary drugs prohibited by the state (furazone metabolites).
   The unit’s behavior in operating edible agricultural products (public hairy crabs) that use veterinary drugs (furacillin metabolites) prohibited by the state violated the provisions of Article 25 of the “Measures for the Supervision and Administration of the Quality and Safety of Edible Agricultural Products Market Sales”. When purchasing the male hairy crabs, they fulfilled the obligations of the purchase inspection, did not know that the purchased food did not meet the food safety standards, and truthfully stated the source of the purchase, and the unit was exempted in accordance with Article 136 of the”Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China” Give administrative penalties.
  8. The business department of Keyin Department Store in Laiwu District, Jinan City operates a “sponge cake (baked cake)” case that uses food additives in excess of the limit
   The company’s behavior in operating”sponge cakes (baked cakes)” that use food additives exceeding the limit violates Article 34 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China and Article 34 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China. Article 67, paragraph 3, in accordance with the provisions of Article 126, paragraph 1, and Article 125, paragraph 2, of the”Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China”, give the unit a warning and fines. Thousands (5000.00) yuan, and one ten ba (18.00) yuan of illegal income confiscated.
  9. The edible agricultural product (long beans) operated by Rundu Department Store Supermarket in Laicheng District, Laiwu City, Suspected of Pesticide Residues exceeding Food Safety Standard Limits
   The behavior of the unit’s sales of agricultural products with excessive pesticide residues does not meet the requirements of GB 2763-2019″National Food Safety Standards Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides in Foods” and violates the second”Measures for the Supervision and Administration of the Quality and Safety of Edible Agricultural Products Market Sales” According to the provisions of paragraph 2 of Article 15, in view of the fact that the unit has fulfilled its obligations such as purchase inspections, did not know that the purchased food did not meet the food safety standards, and truthfully stated the source of the purchase, it was based on the”Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China” 130 Article 16 Exempting units from administrative penalties.
  10. The nutrition label of watermelon-flavored toast bread sold in Qiyongjun Department Store Supermarket, Laiwu District, Jinan City, does not meet the requirements of the national standard (GB28050-2011 Schedule B2.2) and the food additives exceed the standard and the purchase inspection has not been established Record and save relevant vouchers
   The watermelon-flavored toast bread food nutrition label that the unit sold does not meet the requirements of the national standard (GB28050-2011 attached table B2.2), the food additives exceed the standard, and the purchase inspection record and the preservation of related vouchers are not established. According to the provisions of Article 67 and Article 65 of the Food Safety Law, in accordance with Article 125 Paragraph 2, Article 124 Paragraph 1 Item 3, Article 124 of the Food Safety Law Article 126 The first paragraph shall give the unit an administrative penalty of warning, a fine of 5,000 yuan, and confiscation of illegal income of 25 yuan.
  11. The case of edible agricultural products (leeks) sold at Zhongzhong Supermarket in Laicheng District, Laiwu City, after random inspections of excessive procymidone and no purchase inspection records and preservation of relevant vouchers
   The pesticide residue content of the edible agricultural products (leeks) operated by the unit exceeds the food safety standard limit, and the purchase inspection record and the preservation of relevant vouchers are not established, which violates the 25th”Measures for the Supervision and Administration of the Quality and Safety of Edible Agricultural Products Market Sales” Article 2, Article 65 of the”Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China”, in accordance with Article 50, paragraph 2 of the”Measures for the Supervision and Administration of the Quality and Safety of Sales of Edible Agricultural Products on the Market” and Article 50 of the”Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China” According to the first paragraph of Article 126, the unit shall be given an administrative penalty of warning, a fine of RMB 5,000, and confiscation of illegal income of RMB 5.8.
  12. The labels of Shandong Hengliyuan Foods Co., Ltd.’s food products do not comply with the Food Safety Act
   The company’s labeling of food products that do not comply with the”Food Safety Law” violated the provisions of the 71st”Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China” and is based on the”Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China” 122 According to the second paragraph of Article 15, the unit shall be fined RMB 3,000, the illegal income shall be confiscated 621 yuan, and the label of the recalled food shall be confiscated and the brown sugar that does not conform to the food specification is 9 bags of 1000 g/bag, and the specification is 1500 g/bag. 28 bags of administrative penalties.
  13. The case of processing and selling food (soybean oil) that does not meet food safety standards at the Kouyuxiang vegetable oil processing plant in Laiwu District, Jinan City
   The processing and sale of food (soybean oil) that does not meet the food safety standards by this unit violates the provisions of Article 8 Paragraph 2 of the”Shandong Province Food Workshops, Small Catering and Food Stall Management Regulations”, in accordance with the”Shandong According to Article 44 and Article 43 of the Regulations on the Administration of Small Food Workshops, Small Catering and Food Stalls of the Province, the unit shall confiscate illegal income of RMB 510.00 and fine RMB 1000.00.
   14. Case of the sale of food (burrito) with biotoxin content exceeding the limit of food safety standards by the fragrant pancake processing workshop in Laiwu District, Jinan City
   The unit’s act of selling food (burrito) with biotoxin content exceeding the limit of food safety standards violated the provisions of Article 8, paragraph 2 of the”Shandong Province Food Workshops, Small Catering and Food Stall Management Regulations,” according to the” According to Article 126 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China and Article 43 of the Regulations on the Management of Small Food Workshops and Food Stalls in Shandong Province, the unit shall be warned and the illegal income shall be confiscated. 14.00) yuan and a fine of one thousand yuan (1000.00) yuan for administrative penalties.