Announcement of the Hubei Provincial Market Supervision Administration on the Inspection and Disposal of Unqualified Food (No. 6 of 2021)
By: Date: 2021-02-24 Categories: authoritativerelease Tags: ,
   The General Office of the State Administration for Market Supervision issued the”Notice of the General Office of the State Administration for Market Supervision on the Inspection and Disposal of 12 Batches of Unqualified Foods under Sampling Inspection” (Shi Jian Shi Jian Han [2020] No. 2140), involving food production in our province There is 1 enterprise and 3 operating enterprises, and the inspection and disposal of unqualified food are now notified as follows:
  1. The flagship store of Tmall Valley Fengnan (operated by Xiaochang County Gunan Agricultural Products Co., Ltd.) is sold in Zhejiang Tmall Network Co., Ltd. (online shop), nominally Yunmeng County Tiancheng Industrial Co., Ltd. Original nest honey produced (deep mountain nest honey)
   (1) Basic situation of random inspection
  Guangzhou Customs Technology Center is entrusted by the State Administration of Market Supervision and Administration to provide a contract to Tmall Valley Fengnan flagship store (operated by Xiaochang County Gunan Agricultural Products Co., Ltd.) in Zhejiang Tmall Network Co., Ltd. (online shop). The original nest honey (Shenshan nest honey) produced by Yunmeng Tiancheng Industrial Co., Ltd. (production date:2020-09-18, specification model:500g/box) is sampled for inspection. The sample number is GC20000000595931129. After inspection, fructose and Glucose and sucrose do not meet the requirements of GB 14963-2011″National Food Safety Standard Honey”, and the inspection conclusion is unqualified.
   (2) Punishment of violations of laws and regulations by enterprises according to law
  1. Business link
   The behavior of Xiaochang County Gunan Agricultural Products Co., Ltd. violated Article 34 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China. In view of the fact that the party has fulfilled the obligation of inspection of the purchase, and can truthfully explain the source of the purchase. According to Article 136 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China, the Xiaochang County Market Supervision Administration decided to exempt the parties from administrative penalties.
  2. Production link
  Yunmeng County Tiancheng Industrial Co., Ltd. violated Article 34 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China. In view of the fact that the parties proactively cooperated with the investigation after the incident, truthfully stated the illegal facts and actively provided relevant materials. According to Article 124 of the”Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China” and Article 27 of the”Administrative Punishment Law of the People’s Republic of China”, the Market Supervision and Administration Bureau of Yunmeng County decided to confiscate the illegal income of 150 yuan and a fine An administrative penalty of 8,000 yuan.
   (3) Cause investigation and enterprise rectification situation
  1. Business link
   Xiaochang County Gunan Agricultural Products Co., Ltd. actively cooperated with the investigation, truthfully explained the source of the products involved, provided the supplier’s business license, food business license, factory inspection report and other relevant supporting documents, and carried out the recall and removal work in a timely manner. The parties promised to strengthen the study of food safety-related laws and regulations in the future operations, earnestly do a good job in product production and quality inspection, strengthen the inspection of purchase channels, improve food quality and safety, and prevent the recurrence of such accidents.
  2. Production link
   After investigation, the batch of products came from Li Pingli, a beekeeper contracted by the Hebei Poverty Alleviation Project. Because it is a mature honeycomb, the company only did random inspections and labeling, and did not process the products. Since the batch production time is from June to August, which coincides with the end of the flowering period, the beekeepers switched to the field due to insufficient nectar. In order to avoid the large-scale death of honey, sugar was fed as feed, resulting in unqualified products. In response to the identified causes and existing problems, rectification measures were proposed, the relevant responsible persons were criticized and educated, and the inspection process of raw materials and finished products was re-standardized; the contracted beekeepers were issued the”Notice of Rejection of Honey Brewing at the End of Flowering Period” and”Rejection of Feeding”Notice on Feeding Sugar and Brewing Honey”; forming a special class rectification team, training all employees on food safety knowledge, setting up special posts, and responsibilities.
   2. Celery sold at Chengguan Farmers Market (Luo Shaofu) in Hong’an County
   (1) Basic situation of random inspection
  Chongqing Institute of Metrology and Quality Inspection was commissioned by the State Administration of Market Supervision and Administration to conduct sampling inspections of celery sold at the Chengguan Farmers Market (Luo Shaofu) in Hong’an County (production date:2020-10-25, specification model:bulk weighing) The sample number is PJ20000000650832836. After inspection, chlorpyrifos does not meet the requirements of GB 2763-2019″National Food Safety Standard Maximum Residue Limits of Pesticides in Foods”, and the inspection conclusion is unqualified.
   (2) Punishment of violations of laws and regulations by enterprises according to law
   Luo Shaofu’s behavior violated Article 34 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China. In view of the fact that the parties proactively cooperated with the investigation after the incident, truthfully stated the illegal facts and actively provided relevant materials. In accordance with Article 124 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China and Article 27 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People’s Republic of China, the Hong’an County Market Supervision and Administration Bureau decided to confiscate the illegal income of 50 yuan and a fine of 1950. Yuan administrative penalty.
   (3) Cause investigation and enterprise rectification situation
   Luo Shaofu’s failure to fully fulfill the obligation to inspect the goods was the main reason that caused him to sell substandard food. The rectification measures are as follows:strengthen the control of the food procurement process, strictly check the supplier’s qualification documents and the inspection report of each batch of products when purchasing food; strengthen the control of the storage conditions of the food to be sold, and control the food storage area in a scientific and reasonable Within the temperature and humidity range; strengthen the study of food safety-related laws and regulations, and further enhance the awareness of food safety; increase the training of practitioners, implement the responsibilities of various positions, and ensure that similar incidents do not occur again.
  3. Leeks sold at the Chengguan Farmers Market (Wu Zhitao) in Hong’an County
   (1) Basic situation of random inspection
  Chongqing Institute of Metrology and Quality Inspection was entrusted by the State Administration of Market Supervision and Administration to conduct sampling inspections of leeks (production date:2020-10-25, specifications:bulk weighing) sold at the Hong’an County Chengguan Farmers Market (Wu Zhitao) The sample number is PJ20000000650832835. After inspection, procymidone does not meet the requirements of GB 2763-2019″National Food Safety Standard Maximum Residue Limits of Pesticides in Foods”, and the inspection conclusion is unqualified.
   (2) Punishment of violations of laws and regulations by enterprises according to law
  Wu Zhitao’s actions violated Article 34 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China. In view of the fact that the parties proactively cooperated with the investigation after the incident, truthfully stated the illegal facts and actively provided relevant materials. In accordance with Article 124 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China and Article 27 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People’s Republic of China, the Hong’an County Market Supervision Administration decided to confiscate the illegal income of 27 yuan and a fine of 1973. Yuan administrative penalty.
   (3) Cause investigation and enterprise rectification situation
  Wu Zhitao’s failure to fully fulfill the obligation of inspection of the purchase of goods is the main reason for his sales of substandard food. The rectification measures are as follows:strengthen the control of the food procurement process, strictly check the supplier’s qualification documents and the inspection report of each batch of products when purchasing food; strengthen the control of the storage conditions of the food to be sold, and control the food storage area in a scientific and reasonable Within the temperature and humidity range; strengthen the study of food safety-related laws and regulations, and further enhance the awareness of food safety; increase the training of practitioners, implement the responsibilities of various positions, and ensure that similar incidents do not occur again.