Binzhou City Bincheng District Market Supervision and Administration Bureau announced 12 food and drug administrative punishment cases
By: Date: 2021-01-04 Categories: chinesefood Tags: ,
   Binzhou City, Bincheng District Market Supervision and Administration Bureau, in accordance with the provincial bureau’s”Opinions on Several Issues Concerning the Implementation of the”Four Strict” Requirements in Food and Drug Law Enforcement Cases”, Strengthen food and drug safety supervision and adhere to”zero tolerance” for illegal acts. In order to let all walks of life see the market supervision bureau’s attitude that investigations must be carried out and the investigations must be strict, a batch of food and drug administrative penalties by the City West Supervision Office of the Bincheng District Market Supervision Bureau and the Sanhe Lake Supervision Office are now announced.

  01

  Shixi Supervision Office

  Case 1, Bincheng District Mengru Comprehensive Supermarket’s sales label does not meet the prescribed food case

  The party sells food that does not conform to the prescribed label, and his behavior violates Article 53 Paragraph 1 and Article 34 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China Item (11) of Paragraph 1, in accordance with Article 126, Paragraph (3), Article 125, Paragraph (2), Article 126 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China Penalties were imposed and the parties were given an administrative penalty of confiscation of 5 packets of noodles, 1 packet of dried bean curd, and 2 packets of bean wings; and a fine of 5,000 yuan.

  Case II. The butcher shop in Bincheng Wharf sells food that does not meet food safety standards

  The party sells food that does not meet the food safety standards, and his behavior violates Article 34, paragraph 1, (1) of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China The provisions of this item are based on the provisions of Item (1), Article 123, Paragraph 1 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China. An administrative penalty of 10,000 yuan was imposed on the parties.

  02

  Sanhehu Supervision Station

  Case 1. Case of purchasing food raw material mung bean sprouts that did not meet food safety standards at Paji Hongyun Restaurant in Sanhehu Town, Bincheng District, Binzhou City

   The party’s act of purchasing food raw material mung bean sprouts that does not meet the food safety standards violates Article 55, Paragraph 1 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China Provisions, in accordance with the provisions of the”Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China” Article 125, paragraph 1, item (4), administrative penalties. In view of the fact that the parties took the initiative to destroy this batch of mung bean sprouts that were sampled and inspected, to reduce the harmful consequences of illegal activities, in accordance with the provisions of Article 27, paragraph 1, item (1) of the”Administrative Punishment Law of the People’s Republic of China”, it is in line with the”Shandong Provincial Market” For the circumstances stipulated in Item (2) of Article 11 of the Supervision and Administration Bureau’s Exercise of Administrative Penalty Discretion Power (Trial), refer to the”Shandong Provincial Market Supervision and Administration Administrative Penalty Discretion Standard (Trial)” 733 Discretion Standard [ According to the lighter provisions, the party shall be fined an administrative penalty of 11,000 yuan.

  Case 2:Jufuyuan Paradise, Sanhehu Town, Bincheng District, Binzhou City, Procurement of Food Raw Material Mung Bean Sprouts That Does Not Meet Food Safety Standards< /strong>

   The party’s act of purchasing food raw material mung bean sprouts that does not meet the food safety standards violates Article 55, Paragraph 1 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China Provisions, in accordance with the provisions of the”Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China” Article 125, paragraph 1, item (4), administrative penalties. In view of the fact that the parties took the initiative to destroy this batch of mung bean sprouts that were sampled and inspected, to reduce the harmful consequences of illegal activities, in accordance with the provisions of Article 27, paragraph 1, item (1) of the”Administrative Punishment Law of the People’s Republic of China”, it is in line with the”Shandong Provincial Market” For the circumstances stipulated in Item (2) of Article 11 of the Supervision and Administration Bureau’s Exercise of Administrative Penalty Discretion Power (Trial), refer to the”Shandong Provincial Market Supervision and Administration Administrative Penalty Discretion Standard (Trial)” 733 Discretion Standard [ According to the lighter provisions, the party shall be fined an administrative penalty of 10,100 yuan.

  Case 3. The case of purchasing food ingredients Haiba Xuelihong that did not meet food safety standards by Xinquan Hotel, Sanhehu Town, Bincheng District, Binzhou City strong>

   The party’s act of purchasing food ingredients that do not meet the food safety standards, Haiba Xuelihong, violated Article 55, Paragraph 1 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China According to the provisions of Article 125, Paragraph 1 (4) of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China, administrative penalties shall be imposed. In view of the fact that the parties took the initiative to destroy this batch of food raw materials that were randomly inspected, to reduce the harmful consequences of illegal acts, in accordance with the provisions of Article 27, paragraph 1, item (1) of the”Administrative Punishment Law of the People’s Republic of China”, it complies with the”Shandong Province” For the circumstances stipulated in Item (2) of Article 11 of the Market Supervision Administration’s Exercise of Administrative Punishment Discretion Power (for Trial Implementation), refer to the”Shandong Provincial Market Supervision and Administration Administrative Penalty Discretion Standards (Trial)” 733 discretionary standards [Lighter] Provisions impose an administrative penalty of 10,100 yuan on the parties.

  Case IV. Sangji Guozi Cake Shop, Sanhehu Town, Bincheng District, Binzhou City, Procurement of Soybean Sprouts as Food Ingredients Not Meeting Food Safety Standards

   The party’s act of purchasing soybean sprouts as a food ingredient that does not meet the food safety standards violates Article 55, Paragraph 1 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China Provisions, in accordance with the provisions of the”Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China” Article 125, paragraph 1, item (4), administrative penalties. In view of the fact that the parties took the initiative to destroy the soy bean sprouts of the selected food raw materials and reduce the harmful consequences of illegal activities, in accordance with the provisions of Article 27, paragraph 1, item (1) of the”Administrative Punishment Law of the People’s Republic of China”, it is in line with the”Shandong Provincial Market” For the circumstances stipulated in Item (2) of Article 11 of the Supervision and Administration Bureau’s Exercise of Administrative Penalty Discretion Power (Trial), refer to the”Shandong Provincial Market Supervision and Administration Administrative Penalty Discretion Standard (Trial)” 733 Discretion Standard [ According to the lighter provisions, the party shall be fined 10,500 yuan in administrative punishment.

  Case 5, Binzhou City’s Bincheng District Xueli Non-staple Food Wholesale Department’s Operational Labelling of Pre-packaged Food Flammulina velutipes which does not meet the requirements

   The party deals in pre-packaged food Flammulina velutipes with labels that do not meet the regulations, and there is no production date and expiration date on the packaging labels. This behavior violates Article of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China. Article 67 The provisions of items (1) and (4) of the first paragraph of Article 67 shall be subject to administrative penalties in accordance with the provisions of item (2) of the first paragraph of Article 125 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China. In view of the fact that the parties took the initiative to close their doors and shut down businesses to clean up pre-packaged food enoki mushrooms whose labels did not meet the requirements, and to reduce the harmful consequences of illegal acts, in accordance with the provisions of Article 27, paragraph 1, item (1) of the”Administrative Punishment Law of the People’s Republic of China,” The circumstance stipulated in Item (2) of Article 11 of the Provincial Market Supervision Administration’s Exercise of Administrative Punishment Discretion Power (Trial Implementation) shall refer to the”Shandong Provincial Market Supervision and Administration Administrative Penalty Discretion Standards (Trial)” 733 discretion The standard [light] stipulates that the parties shall be given administrative penalties of confiscation of 20 packets of enoki mushrooms, illegal income of 2 yuan, and a fine of 5,100 yuan.

  Case 6, Binzhou City Bincheng District IKEA Baby Kindergarten operating pre-packaged food noodles without production date div>


   The party’s act of operating pre-packaged food noodles with no production date violates Article 67 Paragraph 1 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China ( The provisions of item 1 shall be subject to administrative penalties in accordance with the provisions of item (2), paragraph 1, Article 125 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China. In view of the fact that the parties took the initiative to clean up the pre-packaged food noodles whose labels did not meet the requirements, and to reduce the harmful consequences of illegal acts, in accordance with the provisions of Article 27, Paragraph 1, Item (1) of the”Administrative Punishment Law of the People’s Republic of China”, it complies with the”Shandong Province” For the circumstances stipulated in Item (2) of Article 11 of the Market Supervision Administration’s Exercise of Administrative Punishment Discretion Power (for Trial Implementation), refer to the”Shandong Provincial Market Supervision and Administration Administrative Penalty Discretion Standards (Trial)” 733 discretionary standards According to the “lighter” regulations, the party was given an administrative penalty of confiscation of 5 bags of noodles for illegally operated food and a fine of 6,000 yuan.

  Case No. Seven, Brothers Restaurant in Sanhehu Town, Bincheng District, Binzhou City Procurement The case of soybean sprouts as food raw material that meets food safety standards

   The party’s act of purchasing soybean sprouts as a food ingredient that does not meet the food safety standards violates Article 55, Paragraph 1 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China Provisions, in accordance with the provisions of the”Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China” Article 125, paragraph 1, item (4), administrative penalties. In view of the fact that the parties took the initiative to destroy the soy bean sprouts of this batch of food raw materials that were randomly inspected, and to reduce the harmful consequences of illegal acts, in accordance with the provisions of Article 27, paragraph 1, item (1) of the”Administrative Punishment Law of the People’s Republic of China”, it complies with the”Shandong Provincial Market” For the circumstances stipulated in Item (2) of Article 11 of the Supervision and Administration Bureau’s Exercise of Administrative Penalty Discretion Power (Trial), refer to the”Shandong Provincial Market Supervision and Administration Administrative Penalty Discretion Standard (Trial)” 733 Discretion Standard [ According to the lighter provisions, the party shall be fined an administrative penalty of 11,000 yuan.

  Case 8. Case of purchasing food raw material soybean sprouts that did not meet food safety standards at Haitian Hotel in Bincheng District, Binzhou City div>


   The party’s act of purchasing soybean sprouts as a food ingredient that does not meet the food safety standards violates Article 55, Paragraph 1 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China Provisions, in accordance with the provisions of the”Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China” Article 125, paragraph 1, item (4), administrative penalties. In view of the fact that the parties took the initiative to destroy the soy bean sprouts of this batch of food raw materials that were randomly inspected, and to reduce the harmful consequences of illegal acts, in accordance with the provisions of Article 27, paragraph 1, item (1) of the”Administrative Punishment Law of the People’s Republic of China”, it complies with the”Shandong Provincial Market” For the circumstances stipulated in Item (2) of Article 11 of the Supervision and Administration Bureau’s Exercise of Administrative Penalty Discretion Power (Trial), refer to the”Shandong Provincial Market Supervision and Administration Administrative Penalty Discretion Standard (Trial)” 733 Discretion Standard [ According to the lighter provisions, the party shall be fined an administrative penalty of 11,000 yuan.

  Case 9, Binzhou City Bincheng District Hualian Supermarket Operating Leeks with Excessive Pesticide Residues

  The party’s act of dealing in leeks with excessive pesticide residues violates Article 34(2) of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China and the “Edible Agricultural Products” The provisions of Article 25(2) of the Measures for the Supervision and Administration of Market Sales Quality and Safety are based on Article 50, paragraph 2 of the “Measures for the Supervision and Administration of Market Sales Quality and Safety of Edible Agricultural Products” and Article 50 of the “Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China”. Article 124 The provisions of the first paragraph (1) of Article 124 shall be subject to administrative penalties; in view of the fact that the parties take the initiative to destroy this batch of edible agricultural products that have been randomly inspected and reduce the harmful consequences of illegal acts, in accordance with Article 1 of the”Administrative Punishment Law of the People’s Republic of China” Article 27 The provisions of Item (1) of Paragraph 1 shall refer to the provisions of Item (2) of Article 11 of the”Rules for the Application of the Shandong Provincial Market Supervision Administration to Exercise Administrative Penalty Discretion (Trial)”. Discuss and study, and impose administrative penalties of 1.13 yuan for confiscation of illegal income and a fine of 5,500 yuan for the parties concerned.

  Case X. The case of purchasing food raw material oil and lettuce that does not meet food safety standards in Liuzhong No.1 pot cake, Sanhehu Town, Bincheng District, Binzhou City< /span>

   The party’s act of purchasing food raw lettuce that does not meet the food safety standards violates Article 55, Paragraph 1 of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China Provisions, in accordance with the provisions of Article 125, paragraph 1, item (4) of the”Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China”, administrative penalties will be imposed; in view of the fact that the parties take the initiative to destroy the sampled food raw materials and this batch of lettuce, to mitigate illegal acts Harmful consequences, in accordance with the provisions of Article 27, Paragraph 1, Item (1) of the”Administrative Punishment Law of the People’s Republic of China”, in line with”Shandong Provincial Market Supervision Administration’s Exercise of Administrative Punishment Discretion Application Rules (for Trial Implementation)” Article 11 For the circumstances specified in item (2) of the article, refer to the provisions of the”Shandong Provincial Market Supervision and Administration Administrative Penalty Judgment Standard (Trial)” 733 Judgment Standard [Lighter], and the party shall be fined an administrative penalty of 5,500 yuan.